The compaint cites two (count ’em) counties that had “suspected instances of mail-in ballot fraud.”
From the complaint:
First, an issue caused by Pennsylvania’s SURE software system as to the marking of online applications submitted prior to the June primary election with the “permanent mail-in” status caused some voters to receive duplicate ballots for the general election.
Prior to November 3, 2020, Fayette County uncovered an incident involving two voters who received mail-in
ballots that were already filled out and two ballots that were found at the election
bureau already opened with the secrecy envelope and the ballot missing out of those
envelopes. Ballots that were already filled out arrived at homes 40 miles apart.
Did you do the math?
This complaint cites a total of 11 ballots in Pennsylvania that are suspected of being impacted by voter fraud over the course of the 2020 general election.
Trump’s lawsuit has nothing to do with actual voter fraud. It’s all about the potential for voter fraud.
Using the logic that is presented in this lawsuit, when this case gets in front of a judge, it wouldn’t matter if Joe Biden’s lead as reported by the 67 county boards of election was a million votes, rather than the mere 60,000-vote lead (very conservatively) that will be reported by those election boards.
This lawsuit is not about actual voter fraud. It is about what the plaintiff alleges was a flawed process under which the State of Pennsylvania conducted the 2020 Election.
The complaint doesn’t attempt to quantify the damage caused by the alleged flawed process. There is no attempt to show what Trump’s path to winning in Pennsylvania might have been, were it not for the flawed process. The complaint just presumes that the process was sufficiently flawed, to the point where it denied Pennsylvanians of various constitutional rights.
And because that process was so flawed, the plaintiff demands that the court enjoins Pennsylvania Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar from certifying the results of the election.
If the Trump Campaign could have identified any more examples of voter fraud, is there any doubt that they would have included those examples in their complaint?
And wouldn’t you think that if the process was as flawed as Trump’s crack team of Porter Wright lawyers wants the court to believe that it was (in their 105-page complaint), Trump would have had no trouble identifying at least a few more than 11 total ballots that might have been impacted by voter fraud?